Social media changing the landscape of social activism
Social
media is definitely having an impact on social change and social
activism. I think it is having both positive and negative impacts
depending on the situation. Social media is having a positive impact
on social change and activism as it is allowing more people access to
information and resources about specific movements, etc. This in turn
leads to more people being aware of the issue, so more people might
be willing to get involved. Social media is connecting the world like
never before and helping to keep governments, organizations, etc
accountable for their actions as anyone (i.e. not just journalists,
etc, but anyone that has access to the internet) has the ability to
post information, blogs, videos online for all to see. In this sense
people from outside an issue are likely to gain information from
those inside an issue and so are more likely to understand what is
really going on.
There
is some negative impact to social media however, one negative impact
is that is has led to what some call “slacktivism” or the passive
participation by individual’s online in activities that really do
not lead to social change. Social media makes more people aware of
issues, but it does not guarantee that more people are likely to act
on those issues. So there is much more of a passive audience for
social change through social media. Also because anyone can put up
anything they want to online, sometimes messages or intent of
movements or issues gets misconstrued or misrepresented online which
can lead to people not really knowing the truth about the movement
and spreading false information to their networks. Also social media
networks are also focused around loose ties and although these loose
ties make awareness and the spread of information virally more likely
to occur, it is harder to organize large committed groups of
individual’s through social media than through other more physical
means (e.g. the civil rights movement of the 1960's would have
happened very differently if it had been organized through social
media). I think although there are some drawbacks to the use of
social media, overall it is having a positive impact, because I
believe that awareness is the first step to change of any issue, etc.
I
think the impact of social media is influenced by the country and
culture that it is in. Put simply many countries are still lacking
access to the internet and social media, so therefore issues in those
countries are much less likely to be seen on websites like twitter,
etc and thus their voice might not travel as far as others.They might
have no idea what the internet is or how to use it effectively. Also
if information does come out online about the issue, it is possible
that is comes from a source that is not directly associated with the
issue, because of this, it is possible that the information, although
useful is slightly incorrect and can lead to false assumptions by
others. Also some countries have government control that limits the
internet usage, that can make social media networking more difficult.
Different countries cultural values also change social media
behavior, in America for instance we live in a largely
individualistic society were by social media is readily available and
used by many, because of this the large amount of social media out
there transmits these values and is in English, thus limiting the
participation of others who don't speak English or can understand the
values.
The
Occupy Wall Street Movement is a good example of good use of social
media as it helped clarify what was really going on on the ground as
mass media sources often provided a distorted account of what was
going on. Also Occupy was able to go viral and reach a much larger
audience from all over the globe through the use of social media.
This lead to a unified effort by many to follow the movement,
although they might not share the same intentions, they do share the
same name and that has an impact. Through the use of social media,
Occupy was able to make clear their ideology and mission and also
organize many different subgroups from all over the world so that
individual's knew what to get involved in and how to get involved.
Without the use of social media and the large audience that
participated in this movement, it is possible that Occupy would not
have had the impact that it is having and that it would have been
shut down fairly quickly.
Comments
Post a Comment